Welcome to Healthy Intelligent Training

This book is for all serious middle distance athletes and coaches. It is based on the proven principles of New Zealand’s Arthur Lydiard, the Runner’s World ‘Coach of the Century’, who trained a motley band of neighborhood kids into feared Olympic medalists, and kept on doing it, around the world.

These principles have since guided athletes from many nations to world records and Olympic Gold medals. Now you can plan your own campaigns, and understand exactly what you’re doing at every step. This book can be used and understood by everyone.


Successful middle distance training

How to reach your peak performance

The methods of the "Runner's World Coach of the Century" for today


"The most comprehensive description of Lydiard's training ever written. It blends the scientific explanations of his training with fascinating examples and interesting anecdotes of real situations. If people followed this through as it is written by Keith, they will certainly become champions."
Brian Taylor, (Christchurch, New Zealand): 43 years of coaching runners to national and international levels following the Lydiard methods as well as 22 years teaching human physiology and biology at secondary and tertiary levels.


HI! Middle Distance Training can be described best as an Art, Philosophy and Science. It involves training THREE differing energy systems and muscle fibre types, hopefully to a point where each system is fully trained, and fully rested, “ready to go” at the most important time of the season. This book is based on the work of the legendary New Zealand middle distance coach, Arthur Lydiard, and explores the basic physiology of what his simple system did to produce multiple Olympic gold medals and world records.

Sprinters can get away with working predominantly in one energy system (the alactic or creatine phosphate system) and training one muscle fibre type (the explosive 11B fast twitch) and one neurological pathway.

Distance runners concentrate on the other end of the spectrum, and can again reach very high levels by concentrating mainly on one system (the aerobic) and one muscle fibre type (the slow twitch type 1 fibre).

However, middle distance training is different and far more ‘complex’. It requires a good grasp of the main three energy systems and muscle fibre types involved in racing, and the varying ways we train specific speed endurance and explosive speed in the context of a constantly underlying, highly developed aerobic background. You’ll see, from reading this book, why each of the very fast, powerful anaerobic energy systems relies ultimately on the lower intensity aerobic systems being well-trained and well-rested going into competition.

Enjoy the site, and I’ll keep posting new information as time goes by.


Keith Livingstone



  • Posted by Keith Livingstone
  • Comments Off

Somewhere I said that if an idea wasn’t simple enough to be written down on a matchbox, then it was probably too complicated to get across. So, on that premise, my ‘matchbox’ contribution is that the total volume of low-intensity aerobic base training completed before a peak racing season dictates high-intensity anaerobic outcomes as we get towards peak racing. Or, even simpler: Aerobic training defines anaerobic training potential. Or: Steady Quantity defines eventual Intense Quality.

But hold on! Isn’t there constant discussion everywhere about how there’s never really such a thing as totally aerobic or totally anaerobic? Yep- that’s quite correct. However, we as humans need to label everything and put them into their boxes before we can understand what we’re dealing with- so in this case, we have to talk in very black and white terms to ‘frame our conceptual tapestry’ (nice phrase, eh?).

Why Endurance Training?

The whole human body runs on energy derived from food, water, and the air we breathe: the combustion of glucose, derived in one form or another from long chains of glucose molecules stored as starch (glycogen), or glucose already in the bloodstream from the digestion of foods, or glucose from the reassembly and breakdown of fats and proteins. Glucose can be derived from essential fats (triglycerides) by a breakdown process that cleaves the longer-chain fatty acid molecules into several smaller (glucose) units that can be easily transported across the cell membrane (cell wall) into the internal structures of the cell.The end of the process will always result in a release of energy through the extremely rapid breakdown of high-energy phosphate bonds.

There is ample evidence around to demonstrate that a concerted period of low-intensity training volume results in significant increase in CAPILLARISATION within the trained muscle. There is also ample evidence showing that the body thrives best in a slightly alkali environment, as opposed to slightly acidic. (Think milk versus vinegar). Prolonged high intensity training without due low intensity recovery has been known to elevate ACIDOSIS in the body, which in turn mucks up cell membrane walls, lowers immune response, and mucks up normal fatty acid and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as the highest-energy alactic energy system. So everything will be stuffed, and will need days to recover.(See all the references in the book!)

‘Synaptogenesis’(the formation of new synaptic connections within the neuromuscular system) and ‘Angiogenesis’ (the budding of tiny new blood vessels which eventually become capillaries or even larger venules and arterioles) are far more likely in an alkali environment. Intense training can promote a powerful stimulus for angiogenesis, however this will only really occur if the whole system is allowed to recover adequately. The same for synaptogenesis. With intense training, and the necessary very easy days to recover, you’ll lose a lot of steady aerobic work time, and all the benefits that come with that background.

There is absolutely no point in doing faster, more intense work until a modicum of essential, basic fitness has been acquired. This basic fitness would include good tendon strength and elasticity, and a highly developed capillary system that literally “irrigates” the muscles with fresh oxygen, glucose, and fatty acids, and transports the byproducts away quickly.

Capillaries on periphery of muscle fibres

Once this basic fitness has been acquired, it can be increased methodically over a number of weeks by deliberately running strongly for up to an hour once or twice a week at a level that can be described as “strong”. Build up to the hour steadily in increments of a few minutes each time from a starting level of around 20 minutes within a 1 hour run. The body seems to like variety in its aerobic training, so we include longer slower runs and shorter steady runs on varying courses each week as well.

After a substantial block of consistent training at mainly aerobic levels, but with regular attention to the ’strong’ runs, by the end of 8-12 weeks the body will be substantially faster at all aerobic speeds, due to the proven increase in capillary density. Not only has the physical “plumbing supply and waste removal” capacity been increased, right into the very depth of the muscles, but the oxidative enzymes and energy production pathways within the muscle cells will have gone up significantly. Enzymes are substances that can increase the speed of chemical pathways in the body exponentially in some cases. There are enzymes capable of breaking high-energy bonds between molecules and releasing energy as a by-product, and also enzymes that do the reverse, in order to store energy.

There will be proliferation of ‘mitochondria’ in any muscle cells that can utilize oxygen. Mitochondria are the ‘furnaces’ in muscle cells and other organs that are responsible for mixing these enzymes and fuels in the presence of oxygen to deliver rapid energy by breaking phosphate bonds in the ATP molecule (adenosine tri-phosphate).

images: Dr David Costill

At this stage, we have only discussed the muscle fibres being exercised in a general sense.They’re not all in the runner’s legs. The great secret that seems to be ignored by most writers is that muscles are really organs with a nerve supply and a blood supply, like any other. All organs have a sensory feedback to the central nervous system that monitors blood chemistry constantly. Levels of oxygen, carbon dioxide, mineral balance, alkalinity and acidity are relentlessly examined, and subtle changes made to accommodate imbalances or signs of overload. The organ that also benefits greatly is the heart. Steadily, over a number of weeks, it gets a beautiful network of capillaries all through it, so that the general blood supply to the cardiac muscle is very low-pressure even with very high demands. Think of a high-pressure large diameter pipe that feeds off into hundreds of small pipes: No matter what the pressure is in the main pipe (major artery), the pressure in the small pipes (arterioles) is way less, and if they again join up throughout deep muscle beds of smaller pipes again (’anastamosis of capillaries’) the ability of the blood to deliver fuel and oxygen deep into the muscle on an almost individual cellular basis is greatly increased. Likewise the ability of muscle cells to hand back carbon dioxide in exchange for the oxygen, and also for breakdown products of metabolism (metabolites) to be released back into the bloodstream.

With sufficient endurance training, the cardiac mitochondria proliferate too. They’re big and have multi-tasking capabilities in terms of being able to rapidly break down either long fatty acids or glucose so that this particular muscle never runs out of fuels to burn with oxygen.  With many weeks of subtle high-aerobic pressure on the heart, it will develop a thicker left ventricular muscle wall to go with all the dense capillarisation, however later on in the season with near-maximal interval work, this will bring along stroke volume and power even more.

We haven’t even discussed yet that there are broadly speaking three types of muscle fibre in the human; slow twitch and two distinct subtypes of fast twitch. Each one has its own very strong association with a particular energy system and metabolic profile. Slow twitch fibres are thin endurance fibres with low power, vast volumes of mitochondria, and dense capillary supply to the fibres. They are a deep red colour due to to the presence of oxygen-bearing iron complexes (globins) that are the equivalent of the haemoglobin in the red blood cells. Same molecule: only it’s ‘afixed’ within the muscle cell near the periphery, as close as possible to incoming capillaries. The molecule is therefore now named myo-globin due to its presence within the ‘myo’ (or muscle) cell.

Skeletal slow-twitch muscles can bang away constantly for up to 90 minutes, rapidly stripping down fats or glycogen (stored glucose chains) into glucose for delivery into the mitochondria. Slow twitch fibres have enough force to support constant speeds of up to 8.5 miles per hour (13.7 km/hr: nearly 44min 10k pace) for an athlete with normal limb lengths. Thereafter, force comes more and more from fast twitch muscles, while the slow twitch seem to switch to providing metabolic activity to supply the substrates for the fast twitch fibres, rather than force per se. It’s a fascinating division of labour overseen by the central nervous system.

Fast twitch fibres are large powerful fibres with far lower endurance characteristics, and little or no mitochondrial volume. There are various subtypes now being recognized and discussed. One subtype that becomes far more metabolically active with endurance training is the IIA; this is a big strong muscle fibre that has a good capacity to develop oxidative pathways if subjected to endurance training. The other sub-type, the IIB, is extremely powerful and innervated by huge, highly myelinated neurons. Myelin is a derivative of the much-maligned substrate cholesterol, and is laid down more and more along frequently recruited neuronal pathways by Schwann cells, much as one would tape a bike handlebars or a tennis racket. The purpose of myelin seems to be very similar to the purpose of insulation on high-voltage cables- it helps nerve conduction speed up considerably from source to destination. Fascinating recent research indicates that myelination of major pathways could be the holy grail of neuro-motor training.

The IIB fibre is all power and strength, with no mitochondria and no need for oxygen-based fuel combustion. It’s just a very long cellular bag loaded with high-density muscle fibres and very few organelles. Its dominant energy system is the ‘oxygen-independent anaerobic system’. This is also called the ‘alactic anaerobic’ system because it’s activity is all “done and dusted” before the lactic anaerobic system starts to really kick in.

It’s also known as the creatine-phosphate system, because energy is derived extremely rapidly from the very rapid stripping down of the three-phosphate molecule ATP (adenosine triphosphate) to ADP (adenosine diphosphate), then AMP (adenosine monophosphate). Each time a phosphate is booted off in this sytem, energy is released into muscle contraction. The system has up to 15 seconds of rapid activity before it needs to recover, and the now-depleted adenosine molecule picks up new phosphate attachments from intramuscular creatine phosphate stores.

So, in effect, we have two anaerobic systems and two fast twitch fibres subtypes analogous with them. We have one aerobic system and one fibre type analogous with it.

More next post.

  • Posted by Keith Livingstone
  • Comments Off

Keith is OBVIOUSLY on the left

Keith is OBVIOUSLY on the left

British coach, Colin Livingstone was born at the same time as Keith Livingstone, having the same parents. Some claim him to be a twin, but Livingstone insists that despite shared upbringing, DNA , parents and name, that they are not necessarily related. “It takes a bit more than science or logic to convince me that anything is what it seems” said Livingstone, a natural leader with few living followers.

A European based writer and illustrator, Colin was a competitive distance runner in New Zealand, representing Auckland in national competition over road and cross-country from the 1970’s to the early 1990’s. He relished fast ‘bush running’ on the wild hilly tracks of Auckland’s west coast, long before the days of mountain running as an official sport. He coaches British and Welsh champion, Tim Davies, a three-time winner of the annual Snowdon International Mountain Race, and top performer at European and World level. Tim went from being 15th in Britain to 5th in the world within three years of this progressive endurance conditioning.

This is from quite a long letter/short philosophy course he wrote for a young athlete who wanted to follow the same path as Tim Davies. I thought it was pretty good!

(Keith Livingstone).

“In the developed world, too much emphasis is placed on the physiologist’s approach to exercise. It is expedient and curious, therefore, that the regions who currently lead the world in endurance running comprise mainly the undeveloped nations, with few facilities, physiologists or ’sports psychologists’. Many great runners come from North or East Africa ( Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea), Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria.

Distance running is not about race, altitude or geography: it is about self discovery….a desire to train, attitude, training, planning (knowing when to relax, when to run hard, when to recover ) and gradually increasing thresholds and comfort zones. As I pointed out to one athlete who was trying too hard and years short of his potential, Seb Coe was not born with the ability to run a 3.47 mile. Training made him a 3.47 runner. All results in distance running come from years of gradual adaptation and conditioning. The youth who is near 4 minutes for 1500 at 17, could possibly, with very good coaching, run 3.35 at 23 and 3.30 at 28.

1    Exploding the mythology

Some people are more genetically disposed or ‘gifted’ for distance running, but this is not the deciding factor in reaching your potential . Numerous books and running magazines offer complex tips and schedules to readers on how to improve their running, when it is fundamentally a natural activity,simple and straightforward. 6′ 5″ John Ngugi of Kenya ran in bare feet over the red soil, grass and rolling hills of the Rift Valley, simply ‘running hard’ when he felt good and going easy and long for a few days to recover…in a continuing cycle of effort, recovery runs, steady running, fartlek, easy run with stride outs and so on.

2    If Perception is not reality…then self delusion is not the same as self belief.

When asked of his prospects, the humble yet great John Ngugi simply said ‘I will do my best, I will run as God made me’.

By contrast, a well known British heavyweight boxer has a Psychology degree. Somehow, despite this seeming advantage, this has worked against him. The world of professional boxing is based on 12-15 x 3 minute rounds and no protective headgear, as opposed to 4 x 2 minute rounds at amateur. Therefore, a professional boxer needs the stamina to compete at threshold for 36 minutes, like a distance runner throwing fists. So, here is this great prospect, 2000 Olympic champion, 6′6″ and 250lbs, a southpaw with great left jab, long reach, exceptional power and every reason to believe that he can be the Heavyweight Champion of the World. What went wrong ?

This boxer recently said of the ‘cruel’ treatment meted out to him by the media that ‘Perception is not reality’. True…yet, in his case, his ego ruled his perception to such an extent that what appeared as self belief was self delusion. The two can look remarkably similar,but are cruelly found out in the lion’s den of competition. If this guy had a Rocky like self belief , like Thomas Hearns, then he would have punched his heart out in a guts or glory, win or lose attempt to beat the heavyweight champ. In the hope that he had a 10% chance of a knockout, or at least giving the man a fight, self belief would have carried him through with courage…like the timid boy threatened by the school bully who suddenly finds the lion within him …fighting back, win or lose…he’s going to let this guy know he’s been in a rumble.

I would like to point out, at this point, that sometimes, self delusion combined with motivation, hunger, or an incredible work ethic can actually become self belief!…hence Winston Churchill urging a battered nation to victory…or the exploits of the amputee Spitfire pilot of World War Two, Douglas Bader, escaping from Colditz on tin legs !

Anyway, this boxer came to the Gladiator pit with self delusion, pride and a monster ego that would not face reality.An athlete with Self belief takes on board the reality and then works out what needs to be done, knowing this is going to be a maximal effort beyond anything he’s done before.Self delusion comes to the arena unprepared and unrealistic …and runs for cover like a stunned rabbit when the bombs start dropping or the punches land. The only way to get to world class is to reach national class first…,.then international class… by putting yourself in the Gladiator pit.
You are taking your hidings, wins and losses on the way, until you are the one dishing them out…you never underestimate the task, always respect your competition and conditions…and never expect a result without knowing what it takes. You go into a race with quiet confidence, healthy nerves perhaps…knowing that you have done everything in your preparation, willing to put yourself to the test with enthusiasm, excitement and spirit…not fear or uncertainty.

3   When lack of preparation becomes the enemy of achievement

Fear and uncertainty is the fruit of self delusion and poor preparation. Anxiety is the result of flawed thinking and the subconscious prospect of humiliation .How do we get over this? ..By preparing properly, keeping our mouths shut and our eyes open…and by not having foolish pride. By ignoring pride, or doing our best…we are warriors in the battle. The guy out there in the race is doing it. First or last, he is a winner because he is having a go.

‘Having a go’ and risking all was something our ex Olympic boxer hardly attempted in ten years. With millions of pounds of takings, he could not understand why the working man thought he was a wet blanket.He blamed the media, the BBC…everyone apart from himself for his poor, uninspired showings.He ignored world class agents, managers and trainers and even the advice and sparring prospects of Lennox Lewis. What better offer or opportunity than that?

4   So, what is the lesson here?

This poor guy became over hyped, over analytical and over anxious …and made one huge, fundamental mistake at the beginning of his professional career.He declared  to the world, that like Lennox Lewis, he would be the next great British heavyweight…the World Champ. If he did it once in youthful exuberance or bravado, this would be forgiven and understood, but he said it time and time again as a man in his thirties…without delivering like an Ali .

This is a vital point…but a psychology lesson he never learnt…NEVER expose your hopes and dreams to the world..never boast about what is yet to come. Keep your mission quiet and closely guarded, like a distilled treasure.The truth was that by talking himself up, the guy put incredible pressure on himself at every outing…with tight, inhibited, cautious performances of minimal risk. He never put his head on the chopping block, amassing a 20 knockout record against journeymen.Based on this seemingly unblemished record against mediocre opposition, he ‘convinced himself’ he was the Champ in waiting.

However, despite the Olympic title, he did not fool some. A few durable, tough journeymen went the distance, exposing his weaknesses and raising questions. By the time he fought the much smaller, unheralded guy at 6′2″ and 217lbs, he was knocked out sparco by a thundering right that came from nowhere. By underestimating others, avoiding serious competition, lack of running fitness and hard training, resting on his laurels and beating inferior talents, he was not raising his game or putting himself in the pit…he was giving himself no chance at all when the warriors came to call. By the time the WBA Champ came to collect, he was found wanting, exposed under the spotlights, unable to confront the task before him. If he was a quiet man who trained steadily over 10 years, gradually raising his game against worthy opponents…learning his trade, the outcome may have been very different. He could have been as great as Foreman, Lewis or Liston.

5   A parable perhaps

In running parlance, this is the same as a British runner, perhaps a 28.40 10k man with a national title running a marathon around 2hrs14. He knows that Gebreselassie sometimes runs over 150 miles a week at altitude and can run 10k in 26.20 and a marathon under 2hrs04..some 10 minutes faster. In order to give himself a chance, would the British runner chop his training, avoid tough domestic and international competitions, talk himself up and expect to somehow, magically arrive at world class…running down the Mall with the clock ticking at 2hrs06 at London ? No….of course not…but that is exactly what happened with the boxer…and many runners in Britain today. We are living in the gimme gimme, celebrity quick fix generation…and the Ethiopians and Moroccans are living in the tough, hungry world of hard, uncomplicated people who ‘go out there and run their hearts out ‘…where running 8 miles to school at the age of  7 is normal.

6    More self delusion…getting it right…getting it wrong.

Many British runners today have subscribed to the formula of effort=improvement instead of effort+recovery+ relaxed running=improvement. Several years ago, I read in  Athletics Weekly how a British International, running near 47 minutes for 10 miles, with a marathon around 2hrs14, was going to ‘drop training 120 miles a week at 6.30 a mile, and run 80 at 6.00 or better’. His rationale was that the ‘heavier’ mileage left him ‘tired and heavy’.

Therefore, if you are 10 minutes slower than Gebresellassie and know the best marathon runners in the world are running lots of supplementary running along with faster work, perhaps upwards of 150 miles a week…then why would you think that you are going to have a better chance …or that dropping 50 miles a week is somehow going to get you under 2 hrs 10 ? The Marathon is all about distance and endurance.

So, our British friend drops the training because he ‘feels tired’ when Gebreselassie and the Kenyans run it anyway, regardless of being tired, raising 6 kids in a mud hut, occasional packs of wild animals,a full day’s work reaping corn…or any other ‘obstacle’ that comes their way. Endurance running, above all, is about endurance…the ability to resist and endure. So, how can one be a distance runner without putting in resistance and endurance, the ability to run through tiredness ? Gebreselassie runs mileage, knowing that he can run still run 46 minutes for 10 miles when in heavy training…and well under 45 with a bit of peaking. Kevin Ryan, a great distance runner in New Zealand, could, if required, run a ‘heavy’ 49 minutes for a club 10 miles at the end of a 150 mile week, knowing full well that by tapering for a few weeks, he was actually capable of 47 over a tough, hilly course.

This British guy also named half a dozen other athletes he trained with on a regular basis.He did not consider the idea that his natural competitiveness and training with other good runners may have seen ‘recovery days’ become steady or faster running…gradually sapping glycogen, iron and ferritin stores, because he was not allowing his body to adapt and recover.Therefore, the slower, relaxed mileage is blamed, instead of the unnecessary, faster mileage.

At the time, I said to Tim that although this bloke would feel light and nippy on his feet for a few months, that by dropping the longer relaxed, ‘mitochondrial’ aerobic runs, his 47 minute 10 mile would go to 49, then 50…and instead of reaching that 2hrs10 marker for the marathon, he’d run 2hrs20 out on his feet.That is exactly what happened…

Now, to get to brass tacks…an idea of winter training

Your mission is to build yourself up, not drag yourself down. You want to reach your potential , thrive on your training and look forward to every session. Winter is about strength and getting the work in.Like Mo Farah, El Guerrouj or Bekele…you embrace the necessary.

One idea would be a varied cycle of weeks, with plenty of variety and differing terrains, in order to build a substantial base. It takes at least 6 weeks of progressive aerobic conditioning in order to adapt, but 12 or 18 weeks is far, far better. IMAGINE HOW STRONG you would be after 18 weeks of miles, followed by 6 weeks of hill springing…before the spring and summer racing season started !

I suggest something like the following. REMEMBER THIS IS TRAINING NOT STRAINING !

Sunday

A long, relaxed run over varying terrain, forests and hills of 2 hrs and 30 minutes, perhaps longer. DO NOT RUN HARD. This does not need to be at pace, as time on your feet will develop the mitochondrial, cellular development that we are after. You want to feel invigorated, worked yet good at the end, perhaps looking forward to that cup of tea and hot shower. A lot of runners do not realise this is the benchmark of many champions. You know in the early days that these runs are doing their major job when you finish on “tired, heavy legs”. Later, you trot around with nothing like that fatigue, and faster usually, as you naturally progress.

Monday

a RELAXED run over 70-90 minutes. If you can afford twice a day training, perhaps an easy 70 minute run in the morning, followed by an easy 30-40 minutes in the evening, with 12-15 x relaxed 60-70 metre stride outs on grass.

Tuesday

PM   Warm up for 15-20 minutes, then run for an hour at a steady, strong pace, not racing or time trial….but at a comfortable strong pace that is well below the anaerobic threshold where one starts to get out of breath. You want to get back pleasantly tired, knowing you’ve done a solid block of work that will challenge the higher aerobic systems without overdoing it. Remember, it is very safe and sure to push up your “anaerobic threshold” up from below. For a 50 minute 10 miler, 58 to 60 minute pace might be okay , no need to run quicker than 55 at this stage ! You should feel strong and invigorated, with plenty in the tank. After 6 weeks, the 58-60 pace might come down to 55 or 57 without any perceptible effort, after 12 weeks…you may run 53 to 55…but you do not want this run to become a time trial. At the end of the conditioning phase, a  50 minute 10 miler looking to run 48-49 may well run a strong aerobic Tuesday session in 53. No need to run any faster for this session to fulfil its purpose…which is to develop your higher aerobic zones and ‘anaerobic threshold’  by steadily “pushing it up, from below.” .

Again, perhaps a morning jog of 30 minutes if time allows.

Wednesday

A relaxed longer run of at least 1 hrs 30, perhaps up to 2 hrs if you want, in a forest. Today is about longer recovery, flushing the system, invigorating and stimulating the aerobic system…putting money in the bank !

Thursday

AM   Easy 30-40 minute jog.

PM   Warm up for 15-20 minutes over a good forest trail, golf course, grassy park or similar…then perhaps run 12-15 x relaxed 60-70 metre stride outs …like you are running for a bus, not sprinting after Usain Bolt. Plenty of easy jogging after each; maybe do one stride a lap on a grass track or sports field. This is alactic (without lactic acidosis), developing relaxed speed and turnover, good mechanics and balance, without endangering the aerobic system with the cumulative sprint fatigue you would get with 150 metres, for example. Anything over 10 seconds in length starts to wander into the lactic acid system for most athletes. However, most athletes can stride 60 metres at near top speed, alactically, many times over, without entering the lactic system too much.

After warm up of 15-20 minutes, then run 30-40 minutes of relaxed, invigorating fartlek, perhaps rolling, hilly bursts with efforts of 2-3 minutes, mixing it up in an enjoyable, varied pace session. This stimulates your aerobic capacity and develops your VO2 in a fun manner. You could do next week’s session over hills, but those 2-3 minute injections of high aerobic pace are what create the desired reaction. The ideal workbout should not exceed 3 minutes at 3000 metre pace…in order to create a powerful running stimulus.  Jog a 10 minute warm down afterwards.

Friday

Relaxed run of an hour, any reasonable surface.

Saturday

After warm up of 15-20 minutes, then perhaps run 12-15 x relaxed 60-70 metre stride outs. Jog for 5 minutes, then do one of the following sessions. I have plenty of other variations, but these will start the system response for now. NOTE: the uphill efforts are on very long steep hills in Wales, home of fell-running. So long as you work the uphill efforts hard, you’re developing VO2 max without running at the high speeds usually associated with it.

1  Race tempo practice run of 15-20  minutes (3-4 miles) on good, firm surface, at pace between 10k or 10 miles race speed. 5k is a good distance, so if you are a 30-31 minute 10k man, a 15.30 to 15.40 is reasonable. Warm down jog of 15 minutes. As you get in better condition, towards 12-18 weeks, this could get whittled down to 15 minutes without any perceptible increase of effort. This is quite a tough session, somewhere between anaerobic threshold and Vo2 max pace, but if there’s plenty of steady aerobic all around it during the week, it’ll just be a good “toughener”. Club races have a similar conditioning effect.

2   Fartlek session. After warm up of 15-20 minutes, then run 30-40 minutes of relaxed, invigorating fartlek, perhaps rolling, hilly bursts with efforts of 1-2-3-5 minutes, equal recovery or whatever it takes to get comfortable again, mixing it up in an enjoyable, varied pace session. Jog a 10-15 minute warm down afterwards.

3  Hill VO2 session.After warm up of 15-20 minutes, then run 15 x 60 metres stride outs…followed by 6 x 3 minutes uphill, perhaps a 25% to 30% climb, with recovery of perhaps a minute to 90 seconds. Uphill VO2 works the entire aerobic system without tearing muscle fibres. Alternating this with leg speed is a great, stimulating, invigorating session. Tim’s Todleth cross country course or our Pant Glas road session are good.

4  Hill VO2 session.After warm up of 15-20 minutes, then run 15 x 60 metres stride outs…followed by 3 x 8 minutes uphill, perhaps a 25% to 30% climb, with recovery of perhaps  3 MINUTES MAX.

5  Club race or pack run, not exceeding 10k at full pelt. Any efforts at this stage are purely ‘development runs’ or time trials that push the development of the energy systems above anaerobic threshold intensity.

6   After warm up of 15-20 minutes, then perhaps run 12 x relaxed 60-70 metre stride outs. Jog for 5 minutes, then “VO2 run” of approximately 8 minutes (OR 3000 METRES) on good, firm surface, at your best, well judged pace. This run should only be used once a month in winter conditioning as a stimulus…then more regularly as a pure VO2 session or time trial in lieu of a race, while sharpening up to a peak.

Tim may run this in 8.38 in the middle of winter mileage, yet come down to 8.20 in the summer. Before 5th in the World champs, he ran 8.29, 8.26 and 8.23 with 3 days relaxed running and stride outs between each, over a final two week taper. In the final few days, he ran an easy 2k around 4.45 to 4.50 mile pace…as a bit of an effort without risk, whilst counting down the hours.

Later, he ran an 8.16, an 8.14  and an 8.12 on an accurate road loop course before winning Snowdon and top European performances. I feel he was right on the ‘knife edge’ with these performances in training, however. My recommendation is 95-% of that intensity in future i.e a strong 8.25 in training will not take any edge off a race, where an 8.14 might, for a world-class mountain runner.

Hope this all makes sense, call me if you have any queries.

Cheers for now,

Colin


  • Posted by Keith Livingstone

Randy Todd of Wisconsin wrote in recently with a few queries  about Base training and sub-threshold (”3/4 effort” ) runs.

Q: “At the very top of page 85 you wrote “A strong run for an hour at 1/4 effort during the aerobic base would be equivalent to a run just below the anaerobic threshold, or marathon pace.

Six lines down you wrote “strong “3/4 effort” runs of about an hour, at about 90-95% of anaerobic threshold speed- or, really, “marathon pace” are the best.”

In the first sentence you associate marathon pace with 1/4 effort, and in the
second sentence you associate marathon pace with 3/4 effort.  Is this a
mistake, or am I misinterpreting what you are trying to say?


A: This was a misprint by publishers. The answer is ¾ effort in both instances. 3/4 effort by my interpretation can be roughly said to be 75% (3/4) of Heart Rate Reserve, for those addicted to HR monitors. This in turn, is about 90-95% of anaerobic threshold (15k-21k race pace) speed. So it’s strong, but comfortable, and builds you without tearing you down.

These next questions came about when I compared information about Lydiard’s recommendations for base training: and what Robbie Johnston wrote when comparing Walker’s and El Guerrouj’s “general preparation period”, and information from Part II, For the Nerds (that me!).

Q2: You mention several times that in the aerobic base phase that acidosis is to be avoided.  But in part II, For the Nerds, on page 195 you wrote  “once the highest possible level of aerobic efficiency has been reached, intense running at 95-100% VO2 max is necessary; i.e; longer intervals with equal recovery at 5000m to 3000m pace but no faster.”

A2: The quote on Page 195 is straight from the researchers’ abstract. The interpretation or conclusion is mine.

The research being looked at ISN’T about base building, per se, it’s about VO2 Max. As it says, well-trained distance runners often plateau in measured VO2 max, while still improving their performances. HOWEVER when they perform work at higher intensities than normal, their measured VO2 Max is enhanced.

More questions are raised here : does this newly raised VO2 max then translate to an automatically higher threshold pace in terms of %VO2 max, and an increased performance? Or does the athlete’s threshold speed (and therefore performance level) remain much the same?

I don’t know for sure, but I’d tend to think that the intense work would stimulate a higher threshold speed.

At the end of your base-building period, the AEROBIC contribution to VO2 max should be at its highest, awaiting the higher intensities to top off the ANAEROBIC contribution to VO2 Max.

I refer you straight back to Pg 64-6, Randy, where we look at the two energy system contributions to VO2 Max. The one that takes the longest to develop, over many years, is the aerobic contribution.

Above that level, a lot of the measurement of VO2 Max is actually done while the body goes into very anaerobic metabolism, and this anaerobic metabolism can be developed and topped off in a matter of weeks in an aerobically fit athlete (some experts like George Gandy maintain that an aerobically very fit athlete is only ever 6 weeks away from a PB).

Q3: According to Robbie Johnston’s chapter, in both Walker’s and El Guerrouj’s “general preparation period”, they were doing repeat runs of 1km or 2km from 3km to 5km race pace, which is beyond the anaerobic threshold.

So does this mean that when people with the physiology of Walker and El Guerrouj get to a certain point of aerobic efficiency, that the rule of avoiding acidosis during base phase stops applying to them (as long as they don’t over do it?)  Or am I misinterpreting this?

A3: No, you are not misinterpreting this. The “not overdoing it” is the big point.

Experienced athletes with a substantial aerobic base developed over years can safely introduce small but pivotal amounts of higher intensity intervals in their Preparation Phase, and this serves a purpose by maintaining IIA fibre metabolism. These fibres are the ones most useful for middle distance I’d say. Always, this work is done in a largely aerobic context (ie: runs done prior to and after these sessions are usually at the athlete’s recovery aerobic levels).

As I mentioned in the book, it’s almost impossible to even do a long hilly run without going near or into some acidosis somewhere, but the principle is to limit acidosis as much as possible while running for as long as possible in mostly aerobic zones.

As you’ll understand, IIA fibres can be trained to glycogen depletion quickly by VO2 max intervals, or slowly by very long runs.  Two completely different types of running will stimulate the muscle fibres to make a response. Either way will result in an enhanced performance potential of the IIA fibres.

The first type of training takes the athlete into systemic acidosis, stimulating buffering biochemistry in the liver and at the cellular level. It’ll do this fine if it is trained and recovered from aerobically, 1-2 times a week for about 6 weeks. It doesn’t develop capillarization really: in fact it can inhibit it if overdone.

The second type, Long running, depletes the IIA fibres of glycogen eventually, (the desired “tired, heavy legs” effect) and has the bonus of SAFELY stimulating capillarization as well. A stimulated muscle fibre will respond, once recovered, by increasing its size or surface area across the muscle belly.. and if we can do this, then we have increased the available volume of IIA oxidative/glycolytic fibres to be trained specifically later on.

« Previous Page